发新话题
打印

美国人养犬先要研读法律

美国人养犬先要研读法律

文章来源:河南报业网 | 时间:2006年10月25日

大河网讯编者按:NEWSZW_HZH_BEGIN

在世界各地,许多国家的人们都喜爱养犬,把犬视作人类最亲密的朋友。在中国,随着人民生活水平的提高,养犬之风也渐成风尚。然而,由一些不文明的养犬行为导致的社会问题也日渐凸现,从污染环境到噪音扰民,到狂犬病发病率的上升等等。如何依法养犬、文明养犬,在世界上很多养犬具有悠久传统的国家都有自己的一整套行之有效的应对措施。今日起本版将开设专栏,请本报驻国外记者撰文介绍相关国家在养犬方面的立法和管理经验。希望能提醒国内的养犬人,不要让不文明的养犬行为,成为我们建设和谐社会中的一个不和谐音符。

美国人从普通民众到第一夫人劳拉都爱狗,更喜欢养狗,狗在美国常常被视作家庭中的一员。为了庆祝劳拉58岁生日,布什总统还特意送给她一条名叫“比兹莉”的苏格兰名犬陪伴左右,这条小狗也因此得名美国“第一名犬”。据统计,美国现有4500万宠物狗饲养者,他们共养了6300万只狗。

美国人爱狗、养狗已到了如醉如痴的程度。美国宠物协会最新的一份调查结果显示,近35%的养狗者将狗视为好朋友,约18%的狗主把狗看作是自己的孩子或伴侣,他们中间许多人不仅将狗的照片挂在家中,而且每年圣诞节在给朋友和孩子挑选礼物时,也不忘给狗选上一件礼物,有的主人还“投狗所好”,不时地买冰激凌、蛋糕等犒劳他们的爱犬。甚者还要为狗举行生日会,给狗做寿,宠物狗真正地被美国人“宠”了起来。

但是,美国的法律对豢养宠物的规定也同样完善和系统,其中尤以对养犬的管理规定最为突出。大到违法、违规,小到违反了生活小区的“民约”,都有可能要受到法律或经济上的惩处。

犬主人的责任与义务

领取执照据各州法律的规定,凡是狗的主人都必须向当地政府指定的动物保护部门领取执照,领取执照后方能成为合法饲养者。狗的牌照的期限各有长短,主人可以按照自己的需要购买。牌照费用因狗的品种而定,华盛顿哥伦比亚特区狗牌的最高费用为46美元。

定期注射狂犬疫苗美国对定期为狗注射狂犬疫苗工作予以极大关注,为了有效地预防狂犬病在美国爆发和蔓延,美国动物保护协会要求狗的主人定期为狗注射狂犬疫苗,并视情况为同狗接触多的家庭成员接种疫苗。

不能虐待狗一旦拥有狗,狗的饲养者就要履行其义务。各州的法律都一致规定,在美国狗不能用散养的办法饲养,必须关在庭院中和房间里;同时,拴狗时要留有足够的空间,不能将狗锁在比较狭窄的地方。动物保护协会还要求狗主人或者监护人离开狗或让狗独自在家的时间最长不得超过10个小时。狗主及家人外出旅行可以将狗放在托狗所,由托狗所代为饲养和管理。

对恶犬管束针对那些性情暴躁和有攻击性的狗,许多州都通过了《恶犬法案》。根据该法,狗主必须在庭院明显处竖立标牌,提醒过往行人注意;在公共场所,主人必须每时每刻都要为其戴上约束皮带和防止咬人的口套,而且任何时候都不要散养。否则一旦发现,执法部门有权将其充公或者杀死,并且要视情节轻重追查狗主的刑事责任,甚至可以判处其蹲90天大狱。同时,法律还要求饲养这类狗的主人购买10万美元的保险,以备在不幸被狗咬伤时能支付赔偿费。

“睦邻法”调节邻里矛盾

在众多地方法规中最引人注意的法规是《妨碍公共利益法》,这一法规的出台备受非养狗者欢迎,被誉为“睦邻法”。美国法律赋予公民养狗的权利,同时也赋予非养狗者以休息和不受养狗街坊邻居干扰的权利,为了更合理有效地处理邻里之间的关系,《妨碍公共利益法》禁止不间断地狗吠声,尤其是在夜深人静时的连续狗吠。法律要求主人无论何时都要控制狗吠,要求狗主要遵循“三吠”原则处理邻里关系。为此,动物保护协会还鼓励养狗之家要认真听取邻居的意见。

《妨碍公共利益法》还要求,狗主人在遛狗和带狗外出时要及时清理狗的粪便,不要给社区的环境造成污染。记者注意到,几乎在华盛顿所有可以遛狗的公园都备有免费的塑料袋。一旦狗排泄,主人即可用塑料袋处理掉。早晚在街头上遛狗的人手里往往也拿着一个塑料袋,他们随时将狗粪便收集起来。许多友人在谈到对华盛顿印象时都说这里很清洁,晚间走路不用担心会遇到“地雷”。

公寓大楼多不得养犬

记者在采访弗吉尼亚州阿灵顿郡的一个小区时,该区管理人员告诉记者,法律授予人们养狗的权利,但不同的生活小区根据地方法规则有不同的规定。独门独院的住房是理想的养狗场所,公寓里也可以养,但许多小区公寓大楼就不允许饲养狗。主要原因一是公寓周围除了公路外,没有可以遛狗的公园或其他场地;二是狗对环境和住房的破坏性很大,直接影响到其他住户起居;三是狗特别是那些体形比较大的“恶犬”对其他住户的人身安全构成威胁。即使有的公寓楼允许养狗,作为狗主人的租赁者也要破费不少:入住时一次交清500美元的房屋修缮费,然后每月再交50美元的房租费。如果狗主人连续租赁公寓5年,除去物价上涨的因素外,他就要为一条狗付出3500美元的房租!

犬惹祸主人负责任

按照《联邦动物保护法》虐待狗要受到经济处罚或法律制裁,甚至蹲监狱,同样狗闯祸或者由于主人的疏忽致使他人受到伤害,狗主人也要承担法律责任。

在责任方面,许多州制定了非常严厉的法律,即无论是不是主人的过失,只要是你家的狗咬伤了他人,你就要承当法律责任。如果受害人是擅自闯入他人地界,挑逗、刺激或者虐待狗而被狗咬伤,法律将视情对主人从轻发落,但主人也要承担部分责任。在众多的诉讼案中,受害人都要求狗主人赔偿其医疗费、误工费以及其相关费用,正常情况下,狗主人都愿意承担这一经济责任。如果主人态度不好狗的主人有受过类似处罚的历史,那么法官在量刑时则会加重对其的处罚,尤其是常常会做出惩罚性的经济裁决,以起到警醒他人的作用。

《联邦动物保护法》

因狗致人损伤或其主人疏忽致使他人受到伤害的,狗的主人要承担法律责任;同样,虐待狗也要受到经济处罚或法律制裁,甚至入狱。

各州法律

美国各州都有关于养狗的法律规定,均规定任何狗都不得用散养的办法饲养,必须关在庭院中或房间里;但拴狗时要留有足够的空间,不能将狗锁在比较狭窄的地方。

《恶犬法案》

《恶犬法案》系美国关于养犬法律中的最主要的法律之一。该法案规定,狗的饲养者必须在庭院明显处竖立标牌,提醒过往行人注意;在公共场所,主人必须每时每刻都要为其戴上约束皮带和防止咬人的口套。否则一经发现,执法部门有权将其充公或者杀死,并且要视情节轻重追查狗主人的刑事责任,甚至可判入狱90天。

《妨碍公共利益法》(“睦邻法”)

《妨碍公共利益法》是美国关于养犬法律中另一部著名法律,又称“睦邻法”。该法律规定,法律赋予公民养狗的权利,同时也赋予非养狗者以休息和不受养狗街坊邻居干扰的权利。法律要求主人无论何时都要严格控制狗吠,狗的主人要遵循“三吠”原则处理邻里关系。

动物保护协会规章

狗的主人或监护人不得让狗独自在家时间超过10小时;狗的主人及家人外出旅行可将狗放在托狗所,由其代为饲养和管理。名词解释

“三吠”原则美国《妨碍公共利益法》(“睦邻法”)规定,在居民社区中养犬时,邻居一般对第一声和第二声狗吠声是可以忍耐的,但狗叫过“第三声”后,邻居的忍耐力就要耗尽,因此主人一定要想办法不要让狗叫出第四声。如果狗的主人不能控制连续的狗吠,就要受到相应制裁。

TOP

什么叫《恶犬法案》???我靠  ,那是BSL,breed specific legislation  [em11][em11][em11][em11][em11][em11][em22]特别品种立法

TOP

以下是引用allright在2006-12-8 6:08:55的发言:
什么叫《恶犬法案》???我靠  ,那是BSL,breed specific legislation  [em11][em11][em11][em11][em11][em11][em22]特别品种立法

LZ说的是DDL,这个法令是地方性的,以纽约最先发起,限制的是有无故伤人记录的犬只,请您细阅……

Dangerous Dog Law

Any dog which has been proven to have a propensity for unprovoked attacks towards any innocent persons when on public property, may be deemed a dangerous dog. Owners of such dogs must comply with the rules and restrictions mandated by their city or state "Dangerous Dog Law" (if one exists in their area).

当我们对动物的爱成为了一种习惯,小生灵们获得的小小幸福,就会升华成人类永久的幸福!
jenny_052483@hotmail.com
博客:http://blog.sina.com.cn/mmggnft

TOP

英国的吧,从哪看来的哈哈[em06]

TOP

Dangerous Dog Laws

"Vicious dog" or "dangerous dog" laws impose special restrictions on dogs that are officially labeled dangerous or potentially dangerous. These laws, which emphasize prevention, have much to commend them. By focusing on dogs known to pose a danger to people, they can protect the public, crack down on irresponsible dog owners, and lessen the temptation to over-regulate (as in the case of breed-specific bans, discussed below). Unfortunately, many of the laws are so vague that they invite arbitrary enforcement.

Most dangerous dog laws are local, but more and more states are passing such laws. The state laws follow the same general pattern, although they differ significantly from state to state.

Generally, the process of having a dog declared dangerous is set in motion by a formal complaint from an animal control officer or someone who has been threatened or injured by the dog. A hearing follows, at which a judge or public health official hears evidence and determines whether or not the accused dog is actually dangerous under the terms of the law.

If a dog is found to be dangerous, the judge will order the owner to take certain measures to prevent the dog from injuring anyone. At the least, the owner will have to keep the dog securely confined. If the judge determines that the danger can't be kept within an acceptable level, the owner may be ordered to have the dog destroyed or remove it from the city. An owner who violates the court's order will probably be fined and possibly be jailed, especially if the dog seriously injures someone. The dog will be impounded and probably killed.

STATES WITH DANGEROUS DOG LAWS
 
CaliforniaMarylandOklahoma
ColoradoMassachusettsPennsylvania
DelawareMichiganRhode Island
District of ColumbiaMinnesotaSouth Carolina
FloridaNebraskaSouth Dakota
GeorgiaNevadaTexas
HawaiiNew HampshireVermont
IllinoisNew JerseyVirginia*
KentuckyNew YorkWashington
LouisianaNorth CarolinaWest Virginia
MaineOhio

*cities or counties can enact dangerous dog lows that comply with state requirements

Many other states have laws on the books that make it illegal to keep vicious dogs or dogs that are a "public nuisance," but don't provide a procedure for having a judge determine what dogs are vicious. In South Dakota, for example, it is illegal to keep a vicious dog, which is defined as a dog that attacks people unprovoked.1 These laws aren't much help when it comes to preventing injuries; they serve primarily to increase penalties on owners after a dog injures someone.

The next sections discuss the procedures for having a dog declared dangerous.

The Complaint

If a dog has threatened or attacked someone, the frightened or injured person may file a formal complaint with the agency or court in charge of implementing the dangerous dog law. In many places, a local court receives complaints, but sometimes they are handled by the local sheriff, health department, or animal control department.

Who may make such a complaint depends on the law. Most laws allow anyone to complain, but in some states, only a person who has been attacked may lodge a formal complaint. In Vermont, it takes three residents of a town to file a written complaint with the town legislature (selectmen, aldermen, or trustees), and they may do so only if they know that a dog has bitten someone while off the premises of its owner or keeper.2 Under most laws, law enforcement and animal control officers may also file a complaint.

After a complaint is made, a dog that has seriously hurt someone may be seized and held until the hearing is held. New York law, for example, allows a judge to order a dog impounded before the hearing if there is "probable cause" to believe the dog is dangerous.3 Similar rules apply in most places. As a practical matter, by the time a hearing has been scheduled to determine the viciousness of a dog, the dog will probably have been impounded.

Under most dangerous dog laws, after a dog owner has been notified of a complaint, a hearing is held to determine if the dog is dangerous, as that term is defined in the law.

In some states, however, a hearing is held only if the dog owner requests one, after an animal control officer has investigated a complaint and decided to classify the dog as dangerous. The owner is mailed a notice of the decision and gets a chance to argue only by requesting a hearing.

The Hearing

To meet constitutional due process requirements, the law must give dog owners some kind of opportunity for a hearing. The Ohio Supreme Court overturned that state's vicious dog law because it didn't give owners a meaningful opportunity to be heard.4

Basically, the hearing is a shorter, less formal version of a trial. The dog owner, the person who complained, and members of the public can attend and present evidence about the dog's behavior or disposition. Expert witnesses may testify about the likelihood that the dog will cause more problems.

Most often, judges in local courts preside over these hearings. Local health or animal authorities, however, may sometimes hold hearings and make dangerous dog determinations.

Ultimately, the judge's decision must be based on the statute or ordinance, which will define the term "dangerous dog." These definitions range from vague to extremely detailed. Rhode Island officials, for example, have a detailed definition to help them make their decisions. According to the state statute, a vicious dog is one that:

  • threatens someone, unprovoked, in a public place
  • has a known tendency to attack unprovoked or otherwise endanger people or other domestic animals
  • bites, injures, or attacks a person or domestic animal without provocation, on public or private property
  • is trained or kept for dog-fighting, or
  • isn't licensed.

The Rhode Island law states that a dog cannot, however, be declared vicious if it injured someone who was deliberately trespassing on the dog owner's property, teasing or abusing the dog, assaulting another person, or committing a crime.

This statute is more detailed than most. But the factors it sets out are the things any judge would consider when determining whether or not a dog is dangerous. (Note that all unlicensed dogs are automatically considered vicious; not a very logical label, but a very good reason for licensing your dog. The law does provide that the vicious dog label is removed when the owner licenses the dog and pays the fine.)

Under this statute, a dog owner who wants to appeal a vicious dog determination has five days to petition the district court for a new hearing. The court then conducts its own hearing and decides whether the dog is vicious according to the law's definition.5

Restrictions on Dangerous Dogs

Usually, a judge who pronounces a dog dangerous has fairly free rein to impose penalties or restrictions on the dog's owner. At a minimum, laws require that the dog be kept enclosed on the owner's property at all times unless it's leashed and, in some places, muzzled as well. The judge may also order the dog to be sterilized. Again, the Rhode Island statute spells out in great detail the conditions under which a vicious dog is allowed off its owner's property. There, it is unlawful for an owner to let a vicious dog outside the owner's dwelling or a locked enclosure

unless it is necessary … to obtain veterinary care … or to sell or give away the vicious dog or to comply with commands or directions of the dog officer In such event, the vicious dog shall be securely muzzled and restrained with a chain having a minimum tensile strength of three hundred (300) pounds and not exceeding three feet (3') in length, and shall be under the direct control and supervision of the owner or keeper of the vicious dog.

Depending on the specific city or state law and the danger posed by the dog, its owner may also be required to:

  • Post "Beware of Dog" signs prominently. Some states require a sign that contains a warning symbol, not just words, to alert young children.
  • Keep the dog in a locked enclosure, or one that meets certain specifications for height, strength, and other features.
  • Buy a certain amount of liability insurance (usually no more than $100,000) that covers damage or injury caused by the dog.
  • Post a bond with the city or county to cover any damage or injury caused by the dog.
  • Obtain a special "vicious dog" license from the city or county. These licenses are much more expensive than the standard license; for example, in New Jersey, they cost $150 to $700 annually.
  • Have the dog permanently identified with a tattoo or microchip.
  • Notify animal control officials if the dog is sold or given away, and notify the new owner in writing that the dog has injured someone.

A judge who decides that a dog poses a great risk of serious harm may order that the dog be seized and humanely killed by animal control authorities. This penalty, of course, is reserved for dogs considered incorrigible: dogs that have repeatedly bitten people, severely injured or killed someone, or have been trained and used for fighting.

A few states, however, don't give the judge any choice. In Michigan, if a dog is found to be dangerous and has caused serious injury or death to a person - or to another dog - the court must order the dog to be destroyed.6 The same is true in North Dakota; if a dog is found to be a public nuisance that "habitually molests persons traveling peaceably on the public road," the judge must order a peace officer to kill the dog.7

Injuries Caused by Dangerous Dogs

Once a dog has been declared legally vicious but allowed to live, it's unlikely to get a second chance if its owner doesn't follow the judge's restrictions scrupulously. The laws of Kentucky, for example, authorize peace officers to kill any dog that has been found to be vicious if it is running at large.8

At the least, a dog officially labeled vicious will be impounded if it later injures someone. Owners may also have to pay double or triple damages to the injured person. In Maine, for example, an owner who doesn't comply with a judge's order to confine or muzzle a dog is liable for three times the amount of damage the dog causes.9 In Rhode Island, if a vicious dog injures someone, the owner must pay a fine to the government and triple damages to the injured person.

The owner of a vicious dog who doesn't comply with the law's conditions on keeping the dog securely confined and away from people may be guilty of a crime. (See "Criminal Penalties for Owners of Dangerous Dogs," below.)

TOP

不过可惜呀,DDL不是主流,BSL才是主流,你在中国用DDL去碰BSL是不是有些牵强了

TOP

Usually, a DDL in not linked to a specific breed. Dangerous Dog Laws are generally based on the actions of a dog and the actions of its owner.

BSL (Breed Specific Legislation) is linked to a dog's breed. BSL laws are laws that affect only certain breeds.

Example:

DDL: All dogs must be leashed in public and leash must be no longer than 6 feet.

BSL: All Pit Bull type dogs must be mussled in public, must be leashed and leash must be no longer than 4 feet.

DDL punishes the actions of a dog - not the breed.

BSL punishes the breed of dog - not the actions.

Note: A Dangerous Dog Law becomes BSL as soon as any breed specific language is added to the law.

TOP

Dangerous Dog Laws are focused on the actions of the dog - not on the dog's breed.

Breed Specific Laws are laws that only apply to certain breeds of dogs.

Here is a link to a good site that explains what Dangerous Dog Laws are:
http://doglaw.hugpug.com/doglaw_090.html

DDL punishes the deed, not the breed

BSL punishes the breed, not the deed.

TOP

发新话题